![]() ![]() ![]() When reviewing a traditional motion for summary judgment, the following standards apply: (1) the movant for summary judgment has the burden of showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law (2) in deciding whether there is a disputed material fact issue precluding summary judgment, evidence favorable to the nonmovant will be taken as true and (3) every reasonable inference must be indulged in favor of the nonmovant and any doubts resolved in its favor. ![]() In its first issue on appeal, Western argues that the trial court erred in granting TCAD=s motion for partial summary judgment. The contract also restricts the occupancy of the apartment complex with priority being given to Air Force personnel. The Basic Allowance for Housing is determined by the personnel=s rank and grade in the Air Force. The Air Force and Western entered into a contract that established the maximum amount of rent charged to Air Force personnel based upon the Air Force=s Basic Allowance for Housing. The complex provides housing for Air Force personnel and their families. Western constructed the Quail Hollow apartment complex pursuant to a contract with the United States Air Force. Western appeals the trial court=s order granting TCAD=s motion for partial summary judgment and also the final judgment. The trial court entered a final judgment on January 27, 2005, that Western take nothing on its cause of action and ordered that the appraisal rolls reflect the determined market value for the apartment complex. The trial court granted TCAD=s motion for partial summary judgment on October 4, 2004. (Western) filed suit against the Central Appraisal District of Taylor County (TCAD) disputing the appraised value of its apartment complex for the tax years 2002, 2003, and 2004. CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT OF TAYLOR COUNTY, Appellee ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |